• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Annemarie Shrouder International

  • Home
  • About
    • About ASI
    • ASI: Meet the team
    • Book
    • Media
    • Signature Methodology
  • Services
    • Speaking
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • The EDI Journey
  • Blog
  • Contact

Freedom of Speech – for whom exactly?

November 26, 2017 by Annemarie Shrouder 2 Comments

This week I’m thinking again about freedom of speech – and more specifically, who is really afforded this right and who is not?

Cartoon silhouette of someone speaking into a megaphone.

It’s prompted by disciplinary action taken against Masuma Khan by Dalhousie University (now retracted). Ms Khan posted a Facebook comment in response to reactions to her motion to boycott Canada150 celebrations in consideration of Indigenous Peoples and the history/legacy of colonization.In her post, she used the term White Fragility – which, it would seem, white people didn’t like.

No one likes to be called out. And it shouldn’t be new to many of us that people in power – dominant groups – like this even less, particularly when done by those in non-dominant groups. So the backlash isn’t that surprising. But what I wonder about is the reaction to her post, and not the post that caused it – as Shree Paradkar points out.

Here again is an example of who is under the spotlight and who remains hidden and protected in the shadows. Why is it that Masuma Khan’s post was scrutinized and not the fierce reactions of the Conservative Party to her motion? Why aren’t we looking at the impact of those reactions on Indigenous People? What about the subtle and not-so-subtle ways Canada150 (and other acts of omission and commission) demeans Indigenous People, culture and history?

Who is talking about that? Oh wait, Ms Khan was… and was promptly disciplined by her university, asked to take a training course on coalition building and write a reflective essay.

What about the people who responded vehemently to her motion? What about their coalition building skills in the face of their seeming lack of understanding about the legacy of colonization and the impact of Canada150 celebrations on Indigenous people? And…if Masuma Khan’s sentiments had come from someone who is white…would they have faced the same swift reaction by the administration?

Free speech isn’t free for everyone. For some people, it comes at a price.
Take a look around and notice for whom that price exists and for whom it doesn’t.

See more.

Filed Under: Freedom of Speech Tagged With: Canada150, Masuma Khan, White Fragility

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Julia De Paz says

    November 27, 2017 at 3:24 pm

    I was able to read your blog this week. I have been so busy. This is a priority for me so I should make the time to read it every week and reflect on your questions. I am trying to complete the 150 ways to build awareness about Aboriginal culture and struggles. Do you know about this campaign? Basically, they are saying, instead of celebrating the 150 years of the confederation, try to complete some of these 150 acts of reconciliation. http://activehistory.ca/2017/08/150-acts-of-reconciliation-for-the-last-150-days-of-canadas-150/
    I think it needs to be more promoted among the community.
    Thank you for making me see more.

    Reply
    • Annemarie Shrouder says

      February 11, 2018 at 1:34 pm

      Thank you for sharing the link!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Get blog posts in your inbox!

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • About
  • Speaking
  • Education
  • Leadership
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© Copyright 2023 Annemarie Shrouder

This site has been designed and developed in accordance with
international accessibility standards by Cactus Creative